![]() ![]() The most recent version is always used on the application overview page. Both work on Ubuntu, but snaps work out of the box, and Flatpak needs to be installed by the user in this distro, so I think snaps are more attractive to my argument. This is a breakdown of ratings by CrossOver Version. Snaps it's the model created by Ubuntu parent company Canonical, and Flatpaks is the model patrocinated by RedHat. In short, those two methods are like apps are wrapped on android, not exactly like, its comparable, it wrap the software and all his necessary libraries and deliver it to the user packed up, they can even sandbox the software to run on a higher level of security, both are really similar. Since Photoshop and GraphicConverter do not exist for Linux, GIMP is the most. I think I expressed myself correctly and transmited my argument in a constructive way.īIG PS: If the counter-argument its about what distro to use and how to deliver the software: You could stick with Ubuntu and use Snappy or Flatpak wrappers to distribute the program. the award-winning Affinity suite by Serif Ltd. To emphasize this point, Photoshop reigns supreme on Windows and Affinity is currently the underdog, on Linux this isnt the case, Gimp exist, yes, but it not at the same level as professional applications on windows and mac. It offers comparable functions of professional image editing at a. To launch installer, dotnet35 is required. Affinity Photo is an image editor and a good alternative to the market leader Photoshop. Installation fails Execution of Photo fails, after it is installed via workarounds Workarounds. He said that it would cost 500k to port it, and it wouldn't compensate because of the small linux user base, my argument is that: Although the Linux user base is smaller than Windows, Affinity Photo would become the primary option to linux users all over the world, and potentially impulse others to migrate do linux knowing that they would need to rely on Wine to use photoshop. 'wine './drivec/Program Files/Affinity/Affinity Photo/Photo.exe'' fails. As a Linux user myself and a former (and upcoming again) studio sysadmin. Some time ago I saw a post on the forum asking about a linux port of Photo, someone responded as being one of the devs, I don't know if he was one of them or not. In the EULA (quoted from Affinity Photo 2 for MacOS), you further agree to. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |